ESC
Nhập từ khóa để tìm kiếm
↑↓ Di chuyển
Enter Mở
ESC Đóng
Đang tìm kiếm...
Build vs Buy
Spectrum
- All build — full in-house, custom.
- All buy — SaaS for everything.
- Hybrid — common reality.
Build when
- Differentiator capability (recommendation engine for e-commerce).
- Scale economics favor build.
- Have talent + budget for 3-5 year horizon.
- Unique requirement no vendor fits.
Buy when
- Commodity (BI, ETL).
- Speed-to-market critical.
- Talent constrained.
- Vendor ecosystem mature.
Hybrid example
- Buy warehouse (Snowflake), build dbt model in-house, buy BI (Looker), build ML platform in-house.
TCO consideration
- Build: license $0, but engineer cost + maintenance + opportunity cost.
- Buy: license $$, but faster + supported.
- Often build looks cheap year 1, expensive year 3+.
VN context
- Build muốn FTP cao — talent expensive.
- Buy USD pricing — FX risk.
- Hybrid is dominant pattern.
Decision framework
| Factor | Build | Buy |
|---|
| Differentiator | ✅ | ❌ |
| Commodity | ❌ | ✅ |
| Custom logic | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Need fast | ❌ | ✅ |
| Talent rich | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Budget tight | ⚠️ | ❌ |
Anti-pattern
- "Not invented here" — build commodity to ego.
- Buy then customize 80% → costlier than build.